🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid first step," commented the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is largely happening at the state level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from the West, further countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this global debate continues, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.